Hurricane Sally Update
The ActiGraph office is open, and we have resumed normal operations as of Monday, September 21st. Shipping delays are still possible as our community recovers from the storm. If you need immediate assistance, please contact us by email at email@example.com and we will respond as quickly as possible. Thank you for your continued support.
Validity of the GPAQ for Measuring Sedentary Behaviour in a Chilean Adult Population
- Presented on April 2014
Objective: To assess the validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for measuring sedentary behaviour (SB) in the Chilean adult population.
Methods: 204 adults (88/116 male/female, 45.2±14.0) who were randomly selected during National Health Survey 2009-2010 completed the protocol. The participants wore an Actigraph GT3X (AG) for at least 7 consecutive days and then completed the Spanish version of the GPAQ which includes one single-item question for measuring time spent sitting in a usual day. For AG data, at least 10 hours of wearing time and 4 days were required to be valid. Validity was examined using Spearman’s correlation, mean bias and limits of agreement (LoA), with AG (vertical axis <100 counts/minute) as the reference standard. Agreement between the GPAQ and AG for classifying data into quartiles and tertiles was assessed with kappa method.
Results: The GPAQ showed poor correlation with AG (r=0.25, p<0.001), with mean bias of -0.55 h/day and 95% LoA ranging from -1.58 to 0.48 h/day. Agreement between the GPAQ and AG was fair but significant for categorising time spent in SB into tertiles (43.78%, k=0.16, p<0.001) and quartiles (31.84%, k=0.09, p=0.01). For tertiles, nearly 1 out of 2 participants were correctly classified into the lowest and highest quantiles, while for quartiles 1 out of 3 and 2 out of 5 were correctly classified into the lowest and highest quantiles, respectively.
Conclusion: Despite a relatively low mean bias the GPAQ has poor validity when compared with AG. Adjustments by participants’ characteristics may be necessary to improve its validity.