Martin Luther King Jr. DayOur office will be closed Monday, January 17th in observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day. We will reopen at regular business hours on Tuesday, January 18th.
Patterns of Change in Daily Step Counts, Where Does the Change Happen?
- Presented on 2011
Purpose To examine the change in the average daily steps taken at different cadence (steps/min) levels when a change in total steps/day occurs.
Methods A total of 43 people participated in a one week intervention with the goal to increase time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Participants wore a GT3X accelerometer for 7 consecutive days before and after the one-week intervention. There was a wide range of changes in steps/day, ranging from decreases of 3,900 steps/day to increases of 2,835 steps/day. Participants who either decreased (DEC) or increased (INC) their steps/day by 1,500 steps or more were used in this analysis. The average number of steps taken at different cadences (1-19, 20-39, 40-59, 60-79, 80-99, 100-119, and 120+ steps/min) was calculated for pre- and post-intervention data. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-results within each group.
Results DEC participants (n = 7) averaged 7,259 ± 1,453 steps/day pre-intervention and 5,283 ± 898 steps/day post-intervention. INC (n = 9) participants averaged 6,088 ± 2,902 and 8,069 ± 2,963 steps/day pre- and post-intervention, respectively. The results by cadence levels for the DEC and INC groups can be seen in the Table below. Significant differences (p<.05) were found for the 1-19, 20-39, and 40-59 cadence levels for the DEC group and in the 40-49, 60-79, and 80-99 cadence levels in the INC group.
Conclusion In this preliminary investigation in a sample of overweight/obese participants, the change in steps/day among participants who decreased their total steps/day occurred in the non-purposeful movement cadence levels (i.e., < 60 steps/min) while the changes in those who increased their overall steps/day occurred in the purposeful (i.e., walking) cadence levels. These results provide insights into appropriate cadence targets to increase overall physical activity levels for future interventions.
ICAMPAM- Glasgow 2011