Our office will remain closed through Friday, September 18th as we continue to assess the damages caused by Hurricane Sally. ActiGraph team members are working remotely, however shipping delays should be expected at this time. We expect to resume regular business hours on Monday, September 21st. If you need immediate assistance, please contact us by email at firstname.lastname@example.org and we will respond as quickly as possible. Thank you for your continued support.
Impact Of Accelerometer Data Processing Decisions On Data From Large Cohort Studies
- Presented on May 30, 2014
Background: Accelerometers objectively assess physical activity (PA) and are increasingly used in epidemiologic studies. However, processing techniques are not standardized and limit data comparability across studies.
Purpose: To compare the impact of wear-time assessment method and ﬁlter choice on accelerometer output in a large cohort.
Methods: Participants (7,650 women, mean age 71.4y (SD = 5.8)) were mailed an accelerometer instructed to wear it for 7 days, use a log to record dates and times the monitor was on/off, and return the monitor and log via mail. Data were processed using three wear-time methods (log, Troiano and Choi algorithms) and two ﬁlters (normal vs. low-frequency extension (LFE)). Available sample size, wear time and estimated sedentary time, light and moderate-to-vigorous (MV) PA were compared across methods.
Results: Logs had little missing data on dates (<2.5%), but a sizeable proportion had missing on/off times, leading to 9% fewer available subjects compared to algorithms. Using algorithms resulted in “mail-days” incorrectly identiﬁed as “wear-days” (27-87% of subjects); therefore a record of dates (not on/off times) that the monitor was worn is required. Filter choice and wear-time algorithm impacted sedentary time (~40 min higher for normal vs. LFE; 60 min lower for Troiano vs. Choi). Light PA (~40 min lower for normal vs. LFE), and steps per day (~7000 lower for normal vs. LFE) were impacted by ﬁlter choice but not wear-time algorithm, and MVPA was not substantially impacted by either.
Conclusion: Combining recorded dates (but not on/off times) and the Choi algorithm minimized missing data, participant and researcher burden. These data are useful for informing the development of standardized procedures in large-studies using accelerometers and a mail-based protocol.