School of Education, Syracuse University, 820 Comstock Ave., Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Our office will remain closed through Friday, September 18th as we continue to assess the damages caused by Hurricane Sally. ActiGraph team members are working remotely, however shipping delays should be expected at this time. We expect to resume regular business hours on Monday, September 21st. If you need immediate assistance, please contact us by email at email@example.com and we will respond as quickly as possible. Thank you for your continued support.
Can an automated sleep detection algorithm for waist-worn accelerometry replace sleep logs?
- Published on Apr 2018
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to test whether estimates of bedtime, wake time, and sleep period time (SPT) were comparable between an automated algorithm (ALG) applied to waist-worn accelerometry data and a sleep log (LOG) in an adult sample. A total of 104 participants were asked to log evening bedtime and morning wake time and wear an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer at their waist for 24 h/day for 7 consecutive days. Mean difference and mean absolute difference (MAD) were computed. Pearson correlations and dependent-sample t tests were used to compare LOG-based and ALG-based sleep variables. Effect sizes were calculated for variables with significant mean differences. A total of 84 participants provided 2+ days of valid accelerometer and LOG data for a total of 368 days. There was no mean difference (p = 0.47) between LOG 472 ± 59 min and ALG SPT 475 ± 66 min (MAD = 31 ± 23 min, r = 0.81). There was no significant mean difference between bedtime (2348 h and 2353 h for LOG and ALG, respectively; p = 0.14, MAD = 25 ± 21 min, r = 0.92). However, there was a significant mean difference between LOG (0741 h) and ALG (0749 h) wake times (p = 0.01, d = 0.11, MAD = 24 ± 21 min, r = 0.92). The LOG and ALG data were highly correlated and relatively small differences were present. The significant mean difference in wake time might not be practically meaningful (Cohen’s d = 0.11), making the ALG useful for sample estimates. MAD, which gives a better estimate of the expected differences at the individual level, also demonstrated good evidence supporting ALG individual estimates.
- Tiago V. Barreira 1
- Jessica G. Redmond 2
- Tom D. Brutsaert 1
- John M. Schuna Jr. 3
- Emily F. Mire 4
- Peter T. Katzmarzyk 4
- Catrine Tudor-Locke 5
Biology Department, Utica College, 1600 Burrstone Rd., Utica, NY 13505, USA.
College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 1500 SW Jefferson St., Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 30 Eastman Ln., Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
Canadian Science Publishing